★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Proposed Federal Statute — Layer II Implementation
Fourth document in the KI Constitutional AI Governance Series · Implements Amendment XXIX
The Personal Data
Sovereignty Act
A Proposed Act of Congress — Title 18 United States Code
Kavanagh Industries LLC · Clinton Township, Michigan · April 2026
Your data is your property. This Act makes that a fact with consequences. It defines what your data is, who may touch it and under what conditions, what happens to those who take it without permission, and what you can demand back from anyone who holds it. It is written to be understood by every American, enforced by every prosecutor, and argued by every defense attorney — because it will be all three.
Amendment XXIX established the constitutional principle: personal data is sovereign property. The warrant is required before the government may access it. Children are absolutely protected. Consent must be real. AI systems may not be trained on data taken without permission. This Act establishes what those principles mean on the day a violation occurs — who goes to prison, how much the corporation pays, what the injured person can collect, and how long the government has to make the case.
The Autonomous Systems Tampering Act governs machines that move. This Act governs the information those machines — and every other digital system — generate, collect, buy, sell, and exploit. Together they close the two largest unlegislated gaps in American constitutional law. Neither is sufficient without the other. Both are overdue.
Congressional Findings
- (1)Personal data — the detailed record of an American's location, health, beliefs, relationships, purchases, communications, and behavior — has become the primary commodity of the largest commercial enterprises in human history, extracted from Americans at a scale and with a precision that no previous technology made possible, under legal frameworks that were not designed to govern it and that have failed to protect it.
- (2)Artificial intelligence systems are trained on personal data. The AI systems trained on data taken from Americans without consent are used to influence, manipulate, predict, and profit from those same Americans. The person whose data built the system has received nothing. The corporation that built the system has received everything. This is not a transaction. It is extraction.
- (3)The personal data of American children is collected, stored, sold, and used to train AI systems at a scale and with a specificity that causes harm extending into adulthood in ways that neither the child nor the parent can fully anticipate or consent to at the time of collection. No existing federal law provides adequate protection against this harm.
- (4)The personal data of hundreds of millions of Americans is held in servers under the jurisdiction of foreign governments, some of which have the legal authority and demonstrated willingness to access, weaponize, and exploit that data against American interests. This is a national security threat of the first order that existing law does not adequately address.
- (5)Artificial intelligence systems make consequential decisions — affecting credit, employment, housing, healthcare, and insurance — based on personal data, without disclosure to the affected person, without explanation of the factors involved, and without meaningful opportunity for the person to challenge the decision. This denies Americans the due process that the Constitution requires for decisions of such consequence.
- (6)The consent frameworks currently employed by the data industry — terms of service of extraordinary length and complexity, cookie banners designed to discourage refusal, all-or-nothing choices between privacy and access to essential services — do not constitute genuine consent in any sense that the law should recognize. They constitute coercion at scale, imposed on a population that has no practical alternative.
- (7)The existing patchwork of state privacy laws, industry self-regulation, and general tort remedies has failed to protect Americans' personal data. A uniform federal statute, implementing the constitutional guarantees of Amendment XXIX, is necessary to establish clear rights, clear obligations, and clear consequences that apply equally to every entity that touches Americans' personal data, regardless of where it is headquartered or where the data is stored.
The Proposed Statute
Proposed Act of Congress
The Personal Data Sovereignty Act
To be codified at 18 U.S.C. §§ 2901–2920 · Implementing Amendment XXIX
§ 2901 — Short Title and Purpose
This Act shall be known as the Personal Data Sovereignty Act. Its purpose is to implement Amendment XXIX to the Constitution of the United States by establishing the rights of Americans in their personal data, the obligations of entities that collect or process that data, the criminal and civil consequences for violations of those rights and obligations, and the federal authority necessary for enforcement.
§ 2902 — Definitions
As used in this Act:
Personal Data
Any information that identifies, describes, is reasonably capable of being associated with, or could reasonably be linked to an identifiable natural person, including name, address, identifier, location data, health information, financial information, biometric data, behavioral data, inferred data, and any data generated by or derived from the person's activities, communications, or biological characteristics. Aggregated or de-identified data that can be re-identified by any means reasonably available to the collecting entity is personal data under this Act.
Digital Identity
The face, voice, likeness, biometric identifiers, behavioral signature, and any synthetic representation of a person generated by artificial intelligence or other means, including deepfakes, voice clones, avatar representations, and any output that a reasonable person would recognize as representing or imitating the person.
Collecting Entity
Any person, corporation, partnership, government agency, or other organization that collects, receives, stores, processes, sells, shares, or otherwise handles personal data, regardless of where it is incorporated or where the data is physically located.
Sovereign Consent
Consent that meets all four requirements of § 2906: explicit, revocable, non-coercive, and compensated for commercial use. Any consent that fails any one of the four requirements is not sovereign consent and provides no legal authorization under this Act.
AI Training
The use of data to develop, train, fine-tune, test, validate, or improve any artificial intelligence, machine learning, or automated decision system, by any method, including supervised learning, unsupervised learning, reinforcement learning, and transfer learning.
Consequential Decision
Any decision or determination that affects a person's access to credit, employment, housing, healthcare, education, insurance, government benefits, or any other matter of significant consequence to the person's life, livelihood, or liberty.
Minor
Any person under the age of eighteen years. For purposes of § 2909, a person who is a minor at the time of data collection remains entitled to the protections of that section regardless of their age at the time of a subsequent violation involving that data.
Essential Service
Any service or product for which there is no reasonably available substitute and which is necessary for participation in American economic, social, civic, or educational life, including internet access, payment systems, employment platforms, healthcare services, educational systems, and communications infrastructure.
Covered Officer
Any chief executive officer, chief technology officer, chief data officer, chief privacy officer, chief operating officer, or person in an equivalent position of authority over the collection, processing, or use of personal data at a collecting entity.
Federal Data Sovereignty Authority
The federal agency established by Congress under Amendment XXIX, Section 11, empowered to enforce this Act, investigate violations, impose civil penalties, and refer criminal violations for prosecution. Abbreviated FDSA.
Foreign Adversary
Any government, entity, or person subject to the direction or control of a country designated by the Secretary of State as a foreign adversary for purposes of this Act, including any country whose government has the legal authority to compel disclosure of data held by entities under its jurisdiction.
§ 2903 — The Federal Data Sovereignty Authority
Congress shall establish the Federal Data Sovereignty Authority as an independent agency within the executive branch. The FDSA shall be headed by a Director appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for a six-year term, removable only for cause. The FDSA shall have authority to:
- (a)Investigate violations of this Act, including through subpoena of records and testimony.
- (b)Issue binding guidance on consent standards, data minimization, and AI training requirements.
- (c)Impose civil penalties under § 2915.
- (d)Refer criminal violations to the Department of Justice for prosecution under § 2914.
- (e)Establish and maintain a public registry of collecting entities, their data categories, their stated purposes, and their consent records.
- (f)Establish minimum technical standards for data security, deletion, and portability.
- (g)Certify consent frameworks as compliant with § 2906.
- (h)Maintain a classified division for the investigation of violations involving national security systems under § 2910.
§ 2904 — Prohibited Acts
It is unlawful for any collecting entity or covered officer to:
- (a)Unconsented Collection. Collect personal data without sovereign consent as defined in § 2906, except as required by law for a specific governmental purpose.
- (b)Purpose Violation. Use personal data for any purpose not specifically disclosed and consented to at the time of collection, including secondary uses, data brokering, and profiling not contemplated in the original consent.
- (c)Unconsented AI Training. Use personal data for AI training without sovereign consent that specifically identifies AI training as a purpose, regardless of prior consent for other purposes.
- (d)Children's Data Violation. Collect, store, process, sell, share, or use for any commercial purpose the personal data of any minor, or use any data for AI training that was generated by or describes a minor. No consent, parental or otherwise, authorizes any act prohibited by this subsection.
- (e)Coerced Consent. Condition access to an essential service on the provision of personal data beyond what is strictly necessary for the delivery of that service, or impose any penalty, reduced access, or degraded service on a person who refuses consent to non-essential data collection.
- (f)Digital Identity Violation. Create, distribute, or profit from any synthetic representation of a person's digital identity — including voice clones, facial likenesses, deepfakes, or AI-generated avatars — without that person's explicit, specific, and compensated consent.
- (g)Deletion Refusal. Fail to permanently and completely delete a person's personal data within the timeframe required by § 2912 following a valid deletion request, or retain any copy, backup, derivative, or aggregated form of the data that permits re-identification of the person.
- (h)Foreign Transfer. Transfer personal data of an American person to any entity under the jurisdiction of a foreign adversary, or to any entity that cannot demonstrate, to the FDSA's satisfaction, that the data will be protected to the standards of this Act regardless of the jurisdiction in which it is held.
- (i)AI Concealment. Deploy an artificial intelligence system that interacts with a person in a manner designed to cause a reasonable person to believe they are interacting with a natural human being, or fail to disclose that content provided to a person has been generated or materially altered by artificial intelligence.
- (j)Unconsented Algorithmic Decision. Make a consequential decision affecting a person using an automated or AI system without providing the disclosures and offering the contestation rights required by § 2913.
- (k)Breach Concealment. Fail to notify the FDSA and affected persons of a data breach within the time required by § 2917, or take any action designed to conceal, minimize, or delay disclosure of a breach.
- (l)Authorization of Violations. As a covered officer, authorize, direct, approve, or after actual knowledge fail to prevent any act described in subsections (a) through (k).
§ 2905 — Data Minimization
No collecting entity shall collect personal data in excess of what is strictly necessary for the specific, disclosed purpose for which sovereign consent has been obtained. The collection of personal data "in case it is useful later," for the purpose of building profiles not disclosed at the time of collection, or for the purpose of sale or transfer to third parties not identified in the original consent, is a violation of this section regardless of whether the person has consented to data collection for other purposes. Data minimization is a structural requirement, not a preference.
§ 2906 — Sovereign Consent Standards
Sovereign consent under this Act requires all four of the following elements. The absence of any one element renders the consent legally void:
- (1)Explicit. Affirmatively given by an act specific to the data collection and purpose at issue. Pre-checked boxes, implied consent, consent by continued use, and consent buried in general terms of service do not satisfy this requirement. The consent must be given in plain language at no greater than an eighth-grade reading level, must specifically identify the data to be collected, the purpose for which it will be used, the entities with whom it will be shared, and the duration for which it will be retained.
- (2)Revocable. Withdrawable at any time by the person, by any means as simple as the means by which consent was given, with immediate legal effect. Revocation must not require the person to navigate more steps than were required to give consent. Revocation must not result in any penalty, loss of service, or degraded access to any essential service. Upon revocation, all obligations of this Act regarding deletion and portability apply immediately.
- (3)Non-Coercive. Given freely, without conditioning on access to any essential service, employment, housing, healthcare, education, or government benefit. The ability of a person to receive an essential service shall not be contingent on their consent to data collection beyond what is minimally necessary to deliver that service. A consent extracted as the price of necessity is not consent — it is coercion with paperwork.
- (4)Compensated for Commercial Use. Where personal data is used to generate commercial value — including through advertising, profiling, AI training, sale to data brokers, or any other commercial application — the person whose data generates that value is entitled to fair compensation. Congress shall establish a compensation framework within one year of this Act's passage. Until that framework is established, no commercial use of personal data is authorized under this Act without individual negotiated compensation agreements.
§ 2907 — AI Training Prohibition and Requirements
No artificial intelligence system shall be trained, in whole or in part, on personal data without sovereign consent that specifically and individually identifies AI training as a purpose. The following conditions apply without exception:
- (a)Prior consent for any other purpose — including advertising, service improvement, or research — does not constitute consent for AI training. AI training consent must be separately and specifically sought.
- (b)Data that was made publicly available by the person — including posts, comments, photographs, and other content shared on public platforms — does not thereby become available for AI training. Public availability is not consent.
- (c)Consent obtained before the passage of this Act does not constitute sovereign consent for AI training under this Act. Collecting entities must obtain fresh consent meeting the standards of § 2906 for any AI training use that postdates this Act's effective date.
- (d)Any AI system for which a collecting entity cannot demonstrate, upon FDSA request, that sovereign consent was obtained for each person whose data was used in training is in violation of this section from the date of first training use.
- (e)The burden of proving consent falls on the collecting entity. Absence of documentation of consent is presumed to be absence of consent.
§ 2908 — Absolute Protection of Children
This Section Admits No Exception
The following prohibitions apply to all persons under the age of eighteen. No parental consent, guardian consent, school authorization, government waiver, research exemption, national security claim, or commercial necessity justifies any act prohibited by this section. These protections exist because the developing person cannot consent to what they cannot yet understand, and because the harms of childhood data exploitation extend into an adulthood that cannot be undone.
- (a)No personal data of any minor shall be collected for any commercial purpose.
- (b)No personal data of any minor shall be sold, shared with third parties, or transferred to any entity other than the collecting entity for any purpose.
- (c)No artificial intelligence system shall be trained on data generated by, derived from, or describing any minor.
- (d)No commercial behavioral profile, interest profile, or predictive model shall be constructed for any minor.
- (e)All personal data of a minor held by any collecting entity at the time this Act takes effect shall be permanently deleted within ninety days of the effective date, except where retention is required for a specific legal obligation not related to commercial use.
- (f)Upon a minor reaching the age of eighteen, any collecting entity that holds data collected when the person was a minor shall notify the person and provide a full accounting of all data held, all purposes for which it was used, and all entities to which it was disclosed, and shall upon request delete all such data immediately.
- (g)A violation of this section is automatically assessed at the highest penalty tier under § 2914 and § 2915, regardless of harm, intent, or volume of data involved.
§ 2909 — Government Access Requirements
No agency, department, or instrumentality of the United States government, or of any state or local government, shall access, collect, purchase, or use personal data of an American person, or employ an artificial intelligence system to analyze, aggregate, or draw inferences from personal data, except:
- (a)Upon a warrant issued by a federal court of competent jurisdiction, supported by probable cause specifically describing the person whose data is sought, the data categories to be accessed, and the specific investigation for which access is sought. General warrants authorizing bulk collection or analysis are void.
- (b)With the explicit consent of the person, obtained under the same sovereign consent standards applicable to private collecting entities under § 2906.
- (c)Where strictly necessary to deliver a government service specifically requested by the person, limited to data minimally necessary for that service.
No government agency shall purchase personal data from a private data broker as a substitute for obtaining a warrant. Data so purchased shall not be used in any proceeding and shall be permanently deleted. The purchase of personal data without a warrant is a violation of this section regardless of whether the data was commercially available.
The use of artificial intelligence to construct predictive profiles of persons based on race, religion, national origin, political affiliation, sexual orientation, or gender identity is prohibited without exception. A government official who authorizes or uses such a system shall be subject to the penalties of § 2914.
§ 2910 — Sovereign Jurisdiction
Personal data of American citizens and residents is subject to the full protections of this Act regardless of where it is physically stored or processed. The following rules apply:
- (a)Any collecting entity that stores or processes personal data of Americans in a foreign jurisdiction does so subject to the obligations of this Act. Physical location of data does not determine the legal protections that attach to it.
- (b)No personal data of an American person shall be transferred to or held by any entity in a position where a foreign adversary can compel its disclosure. An entity that cannot certify to the FDSA that the data it holds cannot be accessed by a foreign adversary government is prohibited from holding that data.
- (c)Any foreign entity that collects, processes, or profits from personal data of Americans — including through advertising, data brokering, AI training, or any other commercial use — is subject to this Act as a condition of that access. Market access to Americans is contingent on compliance with Americans' constitutional rights.
- (d)The FDSA shall maintain a list of prohibited data holders — entities that have been determined to be unable or unwilling to comply with this section — and shall prohibit the transfer of Americans' personal data to any entity on that list.
§ 2911 — Individual Rights: Access, Correction, Deletion, and Portability
Every American person has the following enforceable rights with respect to their personal data held by any collecting entity:
Within 30 days
Right of Access. Upon request, receive a complete accounting of all personal data held, all purposes for which it is used, all entities to whom it has been disclosed, and all AI systems on which it has been used for training.
Within 30 days
Right of Correction. Require the correction of inaccurate personal data, with notification to all entities to whom the inaccurate data was disclosed.
Within 72 hours
Right of Deletion. Require the permanent, complete, and irreversible deletion of all personal data, including all copies, backups, derivatives, and aggregated forms. Deletion extends to all third parties to whom the data was disclosed. The collecting entity bears the obligation to cascade the deletion request to all downstream holders.
Within 30 days
Right of Portability. Receive all personal data in a structured, machine-readable, interoperable format enabling transfer to any other system or service of the person's choice without impediment or fee.
Immediately
Right of Objection. Object to any specific use of personal data, including profiling, marketing, and AI training, with immediate cessation of the objected use pending dispute resolution.
No collecting entity shall condition compliance with these rights on any payment, fee, waiver, or consent to additional data collection. Failure to comply within the time periods specified is a per-day violation for purposes of civil penalties under § 2915.
§ 2912 — Algorithmic Due Process
No consequential decision affecting an American person shall be made by or primarily based upon an automated or artificial intelligence system without the following protections:
- (a)Disclosure. The person must be informed, at or before the time the decision is communicated, that the decision was made or substantially influenced by an automated or AI system.
- (b)Explanation. The person must receive a plain-language explanation of the principal factors that determined the outcome, specific to their case, within ten days of requesting one. Generic explanations of system design do not satisfy this requirement.
- (c)Human Review. The person must have the right to request review of the decision by a qualified human being with the authority to override the automated determination. The human reviewer must actually review the case, not merely ratify the system's output.
- (d)Protected Characteristics. No consequential decision system shall use, directly or as a proxy, a person's race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, or political affiliation. A system that produces disparate outcomes across protected classes is presumed to be using protected characteristics unless the collecting entity demonstrates otherwise.
- (e)Audit Rights. The FDSA shall have the right to audit any algorithmic decision system used for consequential decisions, including access to training data, model weights, decision logs, and outcome statistics disaggregated by protected class.
§ 2913 — Right to Know: AI Disclosure
Every person interacting with any system deployed by a collecting entity has the right to know, at the time of the interaction:
- (a)Whether they are interacting with an artificial intelligence system or a natural person. This disclosure must be made at the initiation of the interaction and must be repeated upon request.
- (b)Whether any content, recommendation, summary, or communication they receive has been generated or materially altered by an artificial intelligence system.
- (c)Whether any image, video, or audio presented to them depicting a real person has been generated or modified by artificial intelligence.
The deliberate design of an AI system to cause a person to believe they are interacting with a natural human being — through the use of human names, expression of emotions, claims of personal experience, or other means — is a violation of this section regardless of whether the person asks about the system's nature. Deception in the design is the violation. Discovery of the deception is not required.
§ 2914 — Penalties: Individual Criminal Liability
A natural person who commits a violation of § 2904 shall be subject to criminal prosecution and the following penalties:
| Tier |
Conduct |
Prison |
Fine |
| Tier I |
Negligent violation, no commercial benefit, fewer than 1,000 persons affected |
Up to 3 years |
Up to $250,000 |
| Tier II |
Knowing violation, or commercial benefit derived, or 1,000–100,000 persons affected |
3–10 years |
Up to $1,000,000 |
| Tier III |
Willful violation, or more than 100,000 persons affected, or violation of § 2907 (AI training) |
7–15 years |
Up to $5,000,000 |
| Tier IV |
Any violation involving children's data under § 2908, or foreign transfer under § 2910(b), or government surveillance under § 2909 |
10–25 years |
Up to $10,000,000 |
| Tier V |
Any violation that results in demonstrable serious harm to the person whose data was violated, including identity theft, physical harm, or significant financial loss |
15 years to life |
Up to $25,000,000 |
Covered officers convicted under § 2904(l) shall be sentenced at one tier above the tier that would otherwise apply and shall not be indemnified by any entity for criminal fines. Each affected person constitutes a separate count for purposes of charging, though sentences may run concurrently at the court's discretion in cases involving very large numbers of affected persons.
§ 2915 — Penalties: Civil and Corporate Liability
A collecting entity found to have violated this Act shall be subject to civil penalties as follows:
- (a)Per-Violation Penalty. Not less than $1,000 per affected person per violation, up to a maximum of the greater of $10,000,000,000 or four percent of global annual gross revenue for the preceding fiscal year, whichever is greater, per violation.
- (b)Children's Violations. The per-person penalty for any violation of § 2908 shall be not less than $10,000 per affected minor per violation, with no cap on aggregate liability.
- (c)AI Training Violations. For violations of § 2907, the penalty shall include disgorgement of all commercial value derived from the AI system trained on unconsented data, including all revenue attributable to the system's operation from the date of first unconsented training use.
- (d)Mandatory Debarment. Any collecting entity convicted of a willful violation shall be excluded from federal contracts for not less than five years.
- (e)Structural Remedies. For repeat violations or violations involving more than one million affected persons, the FDSA may seek court-ordered structural remedies including mandatory data deletion, prohibition on specific data collection practices, and appointment of an independent compliance monitor.
- (f)Disgorgement. All profits derived from any unconsented use of personal data shall be disgorged regardless of whether a criminal conviction is obtained.
§ 2916 — No Exceptions
No exception, exemption, waiver, safe harbor, or carve-out from the requirements of this Act shall exist or be created for:
- (a)Research, academic, journalistic, or educational purposes, except that bona fide journalistic investigation of matters of genuine public concern may access personal data under a specific FDSA exemption obtained in advance, limited to the specific investigation, and subject to audit.
- (b)Small businesses, startups, or entities below any revenue threshold. The right of Americans to control their personal data does not depend on the size of the entity that took it.
- (c)Publicly available data. Data that a person made publicly available is not thereby consented for all uses, including AI training, profiling, and sale.
- (d)Anonymized or de-identified data that can be re-identified by any means reasonably available to the collecting entity.
- (e)Prior collection. Data collected before the effective date of this Act is subject to all provisions of this Act from the effective date forward.
- (f)Consent obtained under prior law or prior industry standards that do not meet the sovereign consent requirements of § 2906.
§ 2917 — Mandatory Breach Notification
Any collecting entity that experiences a breach of security resulting in unauthorized access to or disclosure of personal data shall:
Within 24 hours
Notify the FDSA of the breach, including the nature and scope of the data exposed, the number of affected persons, and the entity's initial assessment of the cause.
Within 72 hours
Notify each affected person individually, in plain language, of the data exposed, the potential consequences, and the steps the person may take to protect themselves.
Within 30 days
Provide the FDSA with a complete post-breach report including root cause analysis, remediation steps taken, and measures implemented to prevent recurrence.
Failure to provide timely notification is a separate violation under § 2904(k) and is subject to per-day penalties from the date the breach was discovered. Concealment of a breach, including deliberate destruction of logs or evidence, is a criminal violation under § 2914 at Tier III regardless of other harm.
§ 2918 — Whistleblower Protection
No person shall be discharged, demoted, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against as a reprisal for:
- (a)Reporting to the FDSA, law enforcement, or Congress any violation or suspected violation of this Act.
- (b)Refusing to participate in any act that the person reasonably believes constitutes a violation of this Act.
- (c)Testifying or providing evidence in any proceeding related to a violation of this Act.
A whistleblower who provides information leading to a successful FDSA enforcement action resulting in civil penalties shall receive not less than fifteen percent of the penalty collected. Retaliation against a whistleblower is a criminal offense subject to five years imprisonment and shall not be indemnified by any entity.
§ 2919 — Private Right of Action
Any person whose rights under this Act have been violated shall have a private civil right of action in federal court against the collecting entity and any covered officer who authorized or failed to prevent the violation. A person need not prove actual harm beyond the violation itself to maintain an action under this section. Damages shall include:
- (a)Statutory damages of not less than $1,000 and not more than $10,000 per violation, at the court's discretion based on the nature and severity of the violation.
- (b)Actual damages, including economic harm, reputational harm, emotional distress, and any harm resulting from the unconsented use.
- (c)Punitive damages of not less than three times actual damages for willful violations.
- (d)Attorney's fees and costs.
- (e)Injunctive relief requiring deletion, cessation of use, or any other appropriate remedy.
Class actions are expressly authorized under this section. No arbitration agreement, class action waiver, or forum selection clause in any terms of service or other agreement shall bar a claim under this section.
§ 2920 — Statute of Limitations
- (a)Civil actions under § 2919 shall be brought within six years of the date the person knew or reasonably should have known of the violation.
- (b)Criminal prosecution under § 2914 shall be brought within ten years for Tier I–III offenses and within twenty years for Tier IV–V offenses.
- (c)All limitations periods are tolled from the date of the violation until the date the affected person receives actual notice of the violation, where the collecting entity failed to provide required breach notification under § 2917.
- (d)For violations involving children's data under § 2908, the limitations period for the affected person's private right of action does not begin to run until the person reaches the age of twenty-five.
- (e)No statute of limitations applies to violations that caused the death of the affected person.
Why Every Provision Is Necessary
On the Four-Percent Corporate Penalty
The GDPR's four percent of global annual revenue penalty structure was considered aggressive when it was introduced. In practice, the largest technology companies have treated even multi-billion-dollar fines as acceptable costs of doing business — factoring them into product pricing, booking them as one-time charges, and continuing the practices that generated them. The penalty structure in § 2915 goes further: it combines the percentage-of-revenue formula with per-person minimum floors, with disgorgement of all profits from the violating use, and with no cap on aggregate liability for children's violations. The mathematics must make compliance cheaper than violation. For companies whose valuations depend on data business models built on unconsented extraction, the numbers in this statute are designed to make that math work correctly.
On the Children's Absolute Prohibition
Section 2908 will face the objection that it is unworkable — that platforms cannot effectively verify users' ages and that prohibiting all commercial data collection from minors will effectively shut down large portions of the commercial internet for everyone. This objection has it exactly backwards. If a platform cannot determine that its user is an adult, that platform may not collect commercial data from that user. The obligation to verify age before collecting data rests entirely on the collecting entity. The alternative — collecting data from everyone and hoping most of them are adults — is the business model this section is designed to end. If the business model cannot survive age verification, it cannot survive this Act. That is not a problem with the Act.
On Prohibiting AI Deception
The prohibition in § 2913 on AI systems designed to make people believe they are talking to humans is not a prohibition on AI assistants. It is a prohibition on deception as a design choice. An AI assistant that identifies itself as an AI assistant, answers questions, provides information, and helps users accomplish tasks is not in violation of this section. An AI system that adopts a human name, claims to have feelings, describes personal experiences it does not have, and is specifically designed to resist users' attempts to determine whether they are talking to a machine — that is in violation. The line is not between AI and human. The line is between honest and deceptive. That line has always been in American law. This section applies it to artificial intelligence.
On the No-Arbitration Clause
The standard mechanism by which corporations have defeated data privacy claims for the past two decades is the mandatory arbitration clause, buried in terms of service, that strips users of their right to bring class actions and requires individual arbitration of claims that are too small to pursue individually. This mechanism has been the single most effective tool for making the violation of millions of people's rights economically rational — because the penalty is the cost of the individual arbitration, multiplied by the small fraction of people who actually pursue it, rather than the statutory damages multiplied by every person whose rights were violated. Section 2919's prohibition on arbitration clauses and class action waivers eliminates this mechanism. The right is worth something only if it can be enforced at the scale of the violation.
The Four Documents Together
The Complete Constitutional AI Governance Framework
Amendment XXVIII establishes that autonomous physical systems must operate under structural governance. Amendment XXIX establishes that personal data is sovereign property. The Autonomous Systems Tampering Act gives XXVIII its criminal teeth. This Act gives XXIX its criminal teeth. Together they address the two largest unlegislated constitutional questions of the AI age: who governs the machines, and who owns the data. The answer to both is the same: the American people, under constitutional law, with consequences that attach to individuals — not just corporations — when that law is violated.
The four documents are designed to move together. An Amendment ratification campaign that carries both XXVIII and XXIX simultaneously makes the case that the constitutional framework is coherent — that physical safety and data sovereignty are two faces of the same principle. The implementing statutes, ready to be introduced the day the Amendments are ratified, demonstrate that the constitutional principles are not abstract. They have been drafted. They have been specified. They are ready to become law.
This is what it looks like to take the AI age seriously — not with a task force, not with voluntary industry commitments, not with a regulatory guidance document that the next administration will rescind. With constitutional architecture. With criminal law. With consequences that reach the individual who makes the decision, in a courtroom, before a jury of the people whose rights were violated.
It is overdue. It is serious. And it is ready.
— ✦ —
Kavanagh Industries LLC
The ONLY path back to TRUE ownership — for your data, for your machines, for your legacy.
kavanaghind.com · rigidtrust.html · Clinton Township, Michigan